top of page

Why the XRP Ledger is Sometimes Called Permissioned or Semi-Permissioned

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is a well-known blockchain network, praised for its speed and efficiency in processing transactions. However, it often receives the label of being “permissioned” or “semi-permissioned,” which has led to various discussions within the crypto community. This label arises due to specific design choices and governance structures that set the XRPL apart from other blockchains.



Understanding the Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm (RPCA)


The XRPL employs the Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm (RPCA) to achieve consensus on the state of the ledger. Unlike other consensus mechanisms like proof-of-work (PoW) or proof-of-stake (PoS), which are open to anyone willing to participate, the RPCA relies on a voting process among a selected group of validators to reach consensus more efficiently.


Validator Selection and the Unique Node List (UNL)


The term “semi-permissioned” is largely attributed to the XRPL because of the Unique Node List (UNL). Validators play a critical role in confirming transactions and maintaining ledger integrity. However, not all validators have the same influence within the XRPL network.


The UNL is a list of trusted validators that each server in the network uses to participate in the consensus process. While anyone can operate a validator on the XRPL, only those listed on the UNL are involved in the critical process of finalizing transaction ordering. Non-UNL validators can still validate transactions to ensure they meet protocol requirements, but they do not have a say in the consensus that determines the final state of the ledger. This distinction is what gives the XRPL its “semi-permissioned” nature—participation in the consensus process is limited to a select group rather than being universally open.


Governance and Control


While the consensus mechanism within the XRPL ensures that transactions are settled in a decentralized manner, governance is equally important in determining how the network evolves. Currently, only validators on the UNL can vote on amendments, fee structures, and other significant governance decisions. This is different from other blockchains, where governance is often more decentralized and open to anyone operating a node. As such, the XRPL is considered “permissioned” because only a select few can participate in these crucial governance processes.


The Role of Non-UNL Validators


Non-UNL validators still perform essential functions within the network:


• Transaction Validation: They ensure that transactions adhere to the protocol’s rules and are valid within the network’s framework.

• Consensus Monitoring: These validators can observe the consensus process and verify its outcomes, but they do not influence the decision-making.

• Maintaining Network Integrity: By validating transactions, non-UNL validators contribute to the network’s overall security, even though they do not partake in the consensus process.


However, their role is more passive compared to UNL validators. There is also a risk of network forking if a non-UNL validator operates with a UNL that has less than 90% overlap with the majority UNL.


Different Design Choices for Different Purposes


It’s important to acknowledge that every blockchain is designed with specific goals in mind, leading to different architectural choices. There is no one-size-fits-all solution; rather, the best design is the one that meets the intended purpose.


For instance, Bitcoin was designed as a decentralized, permissionless digital currency with a strong emphasis on security and censorship resistance. In contrast, the XRPL was originally conceived as a fast and efficient version of Bitcoin, focusing on transaction speed and low fees. The semi-permissioned nature of the XRPL, with its use of a UNL, reflects these priorities, ensuring both security and efficiency while maintaining some level of decentralization.


This diversity in blockchain design highlights that the “best” blockchain is the one that best suits its intended purpose. The XRPL’s architecture makes it ideal for its primary use cases, even if it operates differently from other blockchains.


David Schwartz’s Perspective



David Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO and one of the original architects of the XRPL, has addressed the controversy surrounding the terms “permissioned” or “semi-permissioned.” He argues that while the mechanisms used to prevent double-spending are significant, the specific way the XRPL achieves consensus is less critical than its overall functionality and effectiveness. Schwartz’s perspective suggests that the focus should be on what the XRPL accomplishes rather than the technical details of its consensus process.


The Balance Between Decentralization and Trust


The XRPL’s “permissioned” or “semi-permissioned” nature is a balance between decentralization and trust. While the network benefits from a controlled and trusted environment, this comes with the trade-off of not being as open as some other blockchains. This balance allows the XRPL to operate efficiently and securely, making it well-suited for a wide range of financial applications.


Conclusion


The XRPL’s designation as “permissioned” or “semi-permissioned” stems from its unique consensus mechanism, the selection process for validators, and its governance structure. While these aspects may raise concerns for those who prefer a fully decentralized blockchain, they also provide the XRPL with the security, efficiency, and trust needed to support its expanding ecosystem. As David Schwartz points out, the real-world impact of the XRPL should be the focus, rather than the specific technical details of its consensus model.


Moreover, it is essential to recognize that every blockchain makes different design choices to meet specific goals. There is no single “best” approach, only the best design for the intended purpose. The XRPL’s design reflects a careful balance between efficiency, security, and decentralization, making it uniquely suited for its role in the global financial ecosystem.


Sources:


• XRPL.org: Running an XRP Ledger Validator, Unique Node List (UNL), Consensus Protections Against Attacks, and Failure Modes

• XRP Ledger Learning Portal: Glossary and Validator Roles


Subscribe to my YouTube @ https://www.youtube.com/@jungleinc


1 Comment


Cstewart1022
Cstewart1022
Aug 19, 2024

🐞🌻🦚🦋 Thank You Jungle! 🐞🌻🦚🦋

Like

Drop Me a Message. We Value Your Feedback!

We've Received Your Message!

© 2023 by Jungle Inc Crypto News. All rights reserved.

bottom of page